- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Works by D. Van De Veer
10 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Disambiguations:
| Donald Van De Veer [8] | D. Van De Veer [2] |
- Health care ethics: An introduction.C. Boorse, D. Van De Veer & T. Regan - 1987 - In Donald VanDeVeer & Tom Regan (eds.), Health Care Ethics: An Introduction. Temple Univ. Press.
- Paternalism and Subsequent Consent.Donald Van De Veer - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):631 - 642.Some philosophers believe that appeals to promoting or maximizing good consequences are a suspect way of attempting to justify coercive interference with another person's actions. Suppose that is true. If there is a presumption that individuals have a right not to be coercively interfered with, then, foregoing utilitarian type appeals, it would seem that the only way to justify coercive interference of a paternalistic sort would be to show that under certain conditions the presumption fails.
- Paternalism and Subsequent Consent.Donald Van De Veer - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):631-642.Some philosophers believe that appeals to promoting or maximizing good consequences are a suspect way of attempting to justify coercive interference with another person's actions. Suppose that is true. If there is a presumption that individuals have a right not to be coercively interfered with, then, foregoing utilitarian type appeals, it would seem that the only way to justify coercive interference of a paternalistic sort would be to show that under certain conditions the presumption fails.
- Are human rights alienable?Donald Van De Veer - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (2):165-176.No categories
- Marx's View of Justice.Donald van de Veer - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (3):366.
- People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees.Donald Van De Veer & Christine Pierce - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9:373-375.
- And Justice for All.T. Regan & D. Van de Veer - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132):313-315.No categories
- Intrusions on Moral Autonomy.Donald Van de Veer - 1976 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):251.Export citation
Bookmark - Justifying “Wholesale Slaughter”.Donald van de Veer - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):245-258.
- Pornography.Donald Van de Veer - 1992 - In Lawrence C. Becker & Charlotte B. Becker (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: Garland Publishing.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rv6xt uwo